Cloud computing has become a cornerstone for businesses aiming to scale their operations securely and cost-effectively. One essential concept within this realm is the Cloud Landing Zone.
An Azure Landing Zone is a well-architected framework within Microsoft's cloud platform. Think of it as your dedicated space in the cloud, meticulously structured to align with best practices. It enables organizations to maximize the potential of cloud computing by maintaining manageability, security, and scalability.
This article unpacks the key considerations and implementation approaches to make the most out of your cloud journey.
What are Cloud Landing Zones?
A Cloud Landing Zone serves as the foundational blueprint for cloud adoption. It is not just a physical space but a set of principles and guidelines that helps businesses:
Build scalable cloud architectures.
Securely manage resources.
Adapt to evolving requirements without unnecessary redesigns.
Without these strong foundations, businesses might face the daunting task of re-architecting setups to meet changing demands.
Key Components of Cloud Landing Zones
Starting in the cloud is relatively straightforward. However, as operations grow, challenges arise in areas like security, resource organization, and scalability. An Azure Landing Zone provides a solution by offering a guided, structured approach.
To craft a robust Cloud Landing Zone, you need to focus on several vital elements:
1. Account and Resource Organization
As your cloud environment grows, maintaining it becomes increasingly complex. Setting up sustainable management practices ensures the scalability of your operations.
Managing accounts and resources efficiently is critical. For instance, AWS recommends a multi-account strategy where:
Different workloads are allocated to separate accounts.
Shared workloads, such as security or networking, are housed in distinct accounts to ensure clarity and better management.
Properly organizing resources helps in streamlining management. Grouping and structuring resources logically makes operational oversight simpler and more efficient.
Understanding your cloud costs and how resources fit together at the organizational level is crucial. This begins with configuring billing structures and active directory (now Entra ID) tenants to ensure clear and efficient cost management.
2. Access Management
Centralized access management is another cornerstone of a Landing Zone. IAM focuses on ensuring that users have the correct roles and permissions to access only what they need. This not only enhances security but also ensures smooth operation.
Considerations here include:
Implementing cross-account access where necessary.
Defining the appropriate level of access for various workloads.
3. Network Architecture
A critical consideration is how the landing zone integrates with existing on-premises networks. Establishing secure connections, allowing for growth, and maintaining network security are all essential.
Efficiently structuring your network involves:
Global network segmentation.
CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing) allocation.
Shared network design that meets the organization’s needs.
4. Security and Compliance Baseline
Cloud environments differ fundamentally from on-premises setups due to their public nature. Structuring security protocols to protect assets in the cloud environment is paramount.
Compliance with organizational and industry standards (like ISO 27001 or NIST) is non-negotiable. Implementing governance policies ensures adherence to these standards while monitoring compliance effectively.
Establishing a robust security framework ensures compliance and protection. This involves:
Encryption standards.
Network security policies.
Access control rules tailored to organizational requirements.
5. Logging, Monitoring, and Auditing
Continuous monitoring allows businesses to:
Implement effective logging strategies.
Monitor activities and logs essential for auditing and operational oversight.
These components, while fundamental, should be tailored to the specific needs and goals of your organization.
Implementing a Cloud Landing Zone
An Azure Landing Zone is a foundational setup that facilitates secure and scalable cloud adoption. If you're ready to implement your landing zone, three key approaches can be explored: DIY (Do It Yourself), pre-built solutions, and expert-led customizations. Let's delve into each method, its benefits, and considerations.
1. The DIY Approach
Organizations with strong technical expertise can explore the DIY method, where full control and flexibility are paramount. This approach involves creating a custom Azure environment by referencing Azure’s extensive documentation. While this method offers an excellent opportunity to understand Azure deeply and customize the setup to meet unique organizational needs, it also comes with significant challenges. Designing and implementing an environment independently requires substantial effort and familiarity with Azure’s ecosystem. Moreover, missing critical components can lead to unforeseen pitfalls.
Advantages:
Complete control over configurations tailored to unique requirements.
A deep dive into Azure’s features.
Challenges:
High initial effort in research and design.
Potential pitfalls if crucial components are overlooked.
2. Leveraging Pre-Built Solutions
For those seeking quicker implementation, Microsoft’s pre-built solutions, available on GitHub, present an attractive option. These accelerators come with pre-configured environments that are regularly updated to include new Azure features. While this method simplifies the initial setup process and offers extensive documentation support, organizations may still need to adapt these solutions to align them with their specific requirements. The balance of speed and customization makes this approach a compelling choice for many.
3. Expert Assistance
For a tailored and expertly managed approach, organizations can partner with consultants who specialize in Azure Landing Zones.
Key Benefits:
Experts collaborate to understand your organization’s cloud adoption journey, challenges, and goals.
Combining the best features of Microsoft’s accelerators with field experience.
Outcome: A solution perfectly aligned with your operational needs, ensuring a smoother and more efficient transition to the cloud.
Benefits of Implementing an Azure Landing Zone
Azure Landing Zones provide a structured framework to:
Ensure Security and Compliance: Predefined policies safeguard data integrity and meet industry standards.
Facilitate Scalability: Seamless integration of services supports future growth.
Optimize Resource Management: Streamlined operations reduce unnecessary costs and improve efficiency.
Choosing the right method depends on your organization’s technical expertise, resource availability, and specific goals. Whether building from scratch, adopting pre-built accelerators, or seeking expert help, the flexibility of Azure’s tools ensures a solution is within reach.
Wrapping Up
A Cloud Landing Zone is the starting point for a secure, scalable, and efficient cloud adoption journey. By focusing on its core components and selecting the right implementation approach, businesses can pave the way for a streamlined and future-proof cloud strategy. As technology evolves, maintaining flexibility and adhering to best practices ensures sustained success in the cloud landscape.
The rapid adoption of cloud technologies has enabled businesses to scale like never before. However, while technical scalability—handling increased traffic, deploying applications, and managing data—can be achieved with existing cloud provider solutions, organizational scalability remains a significant challenge.
This article delves into the key considerations for scaling a business in the cloud, including automation, process optimization, and best practices for managing cloud infrastructure. Insights are drawn from industry experts, including discussions from a recent webinar featuring cloud professionals with decades of experience ( Roman Burdiuzha & Fedir Kompaniiets).
Understanding Scalability in the Cloud
When discussing scalability, two primary dimensions must be considered:
Technical Scalability: The ability to handle increased workloads efficiently using cloud infrastructure.
Organizational Scalability: The ability to efficiently onboard new users, assign resources, and manage cloud environments without operational bottlenecks.
Cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, and GCP offer robust solutions for technical scalability, ensuring traffic volumes can be handled seamlessly. However, businesses often struggle with scaling their internal processes, leading to inefficiencies and high operational costs.
Common Pitfalls in Scaling Cloud Operations
Many organizations experience initial success in adopting cloud services but later struggle as demand grows. Some of the key challenges include:
1. Manual Resource Provisioning
Organizations often start by provisioning cloud resources manually—creating clusters, managing permissions, and handling tickets for user access. While manageable at first, this approach becomes unsustainable as the number of users and requests increases. During the webinar, panelists shared firsthand experiences where teams were overwhelmed by requests, leading to bottlenecks in resource allocation.
For example:
One enterprise reported that their DevOps team was manually handling over 50 resource requests daily, leading to significant delays in deployment timelines.
A financial services company faced challenges when launching a new customer-facing application, as every developer had to wait multiple days to gain access to the required infrastructure.
A growing startup saw exponential cloud adoption but lacked an automated approval process, forcing IT administrators to work overtime just to keep up with access requests.
2. Throwing More People at the Problem
A common reaction to increased demand is hiring more administrators to manually provision resources. However, this approach is not only costly but also inefficient. Manual processes introduce inconsistencies, security vulnerabilities, and delays in providing resources to developers. Relying on a growing team to manage cloud infrastructure manually is a "losing proposition" in the long run.
3. Lack of Standardization
Without a structured approach, different teams may create cloud resources in varied ways, leading to inconsistencies in security policies, access control, and compliance requirements. Businesses often underestimate the complexity of maintaining consistency across environments, particularly when using multiple cloud providers.
For example, a multinational corporation using AWS, Azure, and GCP encountered significant issues when trying to enforce a unified security policy. Each cloud provider had different IAM models, network configurations, and monitoring tools, leading to discrepancies in security postures. This lack of standardization resulted in compliance violations and security gaps that took months to resolve.
4. Security & Compliance Risks
Unstructured growth often results in security loopholes. Developers may create public-facing storage buckets or misconfigure permissions, exposing sensitive data and increasing the risk of breaches. Experts stressed the importance of integrating security best practices from the start to avoid costly mistakes later.
Best Practices for Scaling Your Cloud Business
To efficiently scale cloud operations, organizations must adopt automation, enforce best practices, and optimize internal processes. Below are key strategies:
1. Automate Everything
Automation is the cornerstone of scalability. Instead of relying on manual processes, organizations should leverage Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools such as Terraform and Pulumi to define and manage infrastructure.
Benefits of Automation:
Reduces human error and ensures consistency.
Enables rapid deployment of resources.
Simplifies onboarding of new developers.
Improves security by enforcing predefined configurations.
One panelist shared an example where automation reduced infrastructure provisioning time from several days to just a few minutes, highlighting the transformative impact of automation on cloud efficiency. A technology firm that initially required three to five days to deploy Kubernetes clusters implemented an automated workflow using Terraform and AWS Lambda. This reduced deployment time to under 10 minutes while eliminating manual errors and improving resource utilization.
2. Implement Self-Service Cloud Infrastructure
Developers and engineers should be empowered to request and manage their own resources without needing manual approvals. This can be achieved through:
Role-based access control (RBAC) to grant predefined permissions.
Self-service portals where users can request cloud resources within controlled parameters.
Pre-configured templates for common infrastructure needs, ensuring consistency.
Organizations using self-service infrastructure see significant productivity gains, with developers able to deploy applications without waiting on IT approvals.
For example, a fintech company shared how implementing a self-service cloud portal reduced the average onboarding time for new developers from a week to just a few hours, significantly accelerating product development cycles.
3. Use Cloud Management Platforms
Instead of managing infrastructure individually, organizations can leverage cloud management platforms such as Appvia, AWS Control Tower, and Google Cloud Anthos to streamline resource allocation and governance.
4. Continuous Monitoring & Optimization
Implement monitoring tools like Prometheus, Grafana, and AWS CloudWatch to track resource usage and optimize costs.
Use automated security scanning to identify misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.
Regularly review infrastructure policies to ensure compliance with best practices.
Proactive monitoring helps prevent costly downtime and ensures cloud environments remain secure.
5. Foster a Culture of DevSecOps
Security should be integrated from the beginning rather than treated as an afterthought. Key DevSecOps practices include:
Automating security policies within CI/CD pipelines.
Enforcing least privilege access for all users.
Conducting regular security audits and compliance checks.
Organizations that embed security early in their development lifecycle reduce vulnerabilities by over 60%, preventing breaches before they occur.
When Should You Hire More People?
Scaling cloud operations does not always require hiring more administrators. However, new hires should be focused on:
Developing automation scripts to eliminate manual workloads.
Enhancing cloud governance and security policies.
Building internal tools to streamline developer access to cloud resources.
Organizations should track key metrics such as:
Number of cloud resource requests per week.
Time taken to fulfill requests.
Rate of security incidents and misconfigurations.
If these metrics indicate increasing inefficiencies, it may be time to hire engineers specializing in automation and cloud governance.
For example, a startup that scaled quickly to over 100 developers realized too late that they lacked the automation expertise to support infrastructure demands. As a result, they experienced significant delays and performance issues, which could have been mitigated by hiring automation engineers at an earlier stage.
Conclusion
Scaling a business in the cloud requires more than just increasing infrastructure capacity. Organizations must streamline processes, automate provisioning, and implement best practices to handle increased demand efficiently. By focusing on automation, self-service capabilities, and security, businesses can achieve sustainable cloud growth without overwhelming IT teams or increasing operational costs.
Need tailored cloud solutions? Contact Gart Solutions today for expert guidance on scaling your cloud infrastructure efficiently.
Platform Engineering is one of the top technology trends of 2024. Gartner estimates that by 2026, 80% of development companies will have internal platform services and teams to improve development efficiency.
What is Platform Engineering?
It is the process of designing and building platforms that provide infrastructure, tools, and services to support various applications and services. The main goal of platform engineering is to create a powerful and versatile platform that can support various application development and operation processes.
The platform provides developers, operators, and other stakeholders with a user-friendly interface and set of tools to simplify and accelerate the process of application development, deployment, and maintenance.
Development Efficiency
The adoption of Agile, DevOps, and TeamFirst approaches, along with the rapid development of cloud and deployment tools, has led to explosive growth in software development across all segments of the economy. Businesses began to actively increase in-house development in an attempt to improve their own efficiency and occupy new market niches.
A typical development team is cross-functional and includes up to 15 people of different roles - from product manager and developers to QA and DevOps. This composition of specialists allows the team to achieve high autonomy and a high degree of responsibility for the product, which significantly reduces time-to-market.
It is noteworthy that it is undesirable to involve more than 15 people in teams: research results show that in this case, it becomes more difficult to build communications within the team, participants start to "cluster" by communication nodes, and trust between them decreases. This inevitably affects the performance of the entire team.
Technical specialists and businesses, as a rule, face typical problems inherent in teams regardless of their tasks and sphere of activity:
Development efficiency directly depends on how much time a team devotes to developing software functionality that is valuable to the business. At the same time, teams have mandatory activities that have nothing to do with creating business value: onboarding new employees, setting up monitoring services for the product, building CI/CD pipelines. The team usually spends a lot of time and resources on all these activities, distracting them from development. At the same time, the allowable amount of cognitive load teams have is limited (primarily due to the limit of team members).
It is important for business that time-to-market of developed solutions and functions be minimal. But in practice, the development team is dependent on specialists from other departments: it is difficult to achieve full autonomy in delivery and maintain high efficiency, as the complexity of software and the conditions of its production and operation are constantly growing.
Development teams have a lot of routine by default, which often not only affects the team's productivity in terms of product delivery (resulting in delays in releases), but also reduces the quality of delivered solutions. If the problem of routine is unresolved, you can get a situation with constant overtime and consequent drop in morale, burnout, and apathy. All of these have significant negative consequences for the product and the business.
The key task is to rid technicians of routine, artificial constraints and dependencies.
Streamline your DevOps with Gart Solutions – Let’s build a scalable platform together. Get in touch today!
Platform Engineering and Internal Development Platform
Platform Engineering is a methodology for organizing development teams and the tools around them, which allows removing unnecessary non-core workload from development teams, thus increasing their productivity in delivering business value.
One example of the platform approach is the creation of an Internal Development Platform (IDP), through which the development team can solve all non-core issues in a self-service mode - from requesting infrastructure and environments to accessing Observability services, necessary development tools, and utilizing typical build and deployment pipelines.
Internal Development Platform (IDP) serves as a one-stop-shop platform for developers:
Maximizes Developer Experience;
Provides a single point of entry, simplifying onboarding;
Reduces the cognitive load for development teams, thereby increasing their productivity.
Thus, the better and more fully implemented the back-end platform is, the higher the efficiency of development teams.
Let's take a closer look at the implementation of the platform approach using IDP as an example.
The Genesis of Internal Development Platforms
The trend of creating Internal Development Platforms (IDPs) is relatively new, but the industry has been moving towards them for quite some time.
Early Signs of the Need for IDPs
Even during the early stages of the digital transformation trend (2012-2015), three key points became apparent:
Teams within a company go through the same onboarding process: This includes gaining access to tools and resources for building and deploying code, and so on.
Teams use similar CI/CD processes for building and deploying products, as well as identical Observability techniques. Moreover, many teams solve the same architectural problems, such as creating a fault-tolerant PostgreSQL or developing Stateless microservices.
Development speed is often slowed down by IT and Information Security (IS) departments. These departments became bottlenecks on the path to product delivery. While development teams were able to adapt to rapid changes and deployments, IT and IS departments often lagged behind. Many operations in these departments were manual, and processes were slow and not scalable.
The Need for a Solution
Companies needed to minimize this duplication of work and bypass these limitations without compromising security. The solution was the idea of consolidating all best architectural practices, configuration templates, embedding IS requirements into the infrastructure deployment workflow, and automating the allocation of development tools, with subsequent provision of all of the above using the "as a service" (aaS) model.
The Birth of IDPs
Thus, internal platforms began to emerge, and development teams gained a single portal through which they could request everything they needed to work without months of configuration and approvals. This could include virtual machines, Kubernetes clusters, databases, creating repositories in GitLab, deploying repositories, and so on.
Simplify your DevOps – Explore our platform engineering solutions. Talk to our team today!
Implementation Features of Internal Development Platforms
Today, almost all large companies are either considering or already using IDPs.
In the enterprise segment, IDP platforms are often built on the basis of cloud orchestrators (HP CSA, VMware vRA, OpenStack, etc.), which provide an IT service "constructor" and a wide stack of plugins for quick creation of self-service portals with a service catalog. As a rule, companies in the enterprise segment are assisted in this by integrators who have the necessary competencies.
At the same time, many companies create development platforms from scratch, without using ready-made solutions. This is usually done by companies with a high level of development culture who have a clear idea of what they want to get from the platform and are willing to invest significant resources in its creation and support. This allows them to integrate their own custom-built infrastructure services (Observability, IaM, etc.), CI/CD tools, and other solutions into the IDP.
In other words, IDPs in such companies are specifically tailored to the internal development business processes.
Why Platform Engineering Is Trending
Platform Engineering has become a trend because the challenges it addresses have become widespread and the benefits of its implementation are clear.
The positive outcomes of using Platform Engineering include:
Alignment of the technology stack across teams: The use of the same services and tools by different teams, available in the IDP, allows for increased efficiency of cross-team work, minimizes "shadow IT", and reduces "competency silos" in which individual specialists and even teams operate.
Reduction of technology sprawl: Building an IDP allows for the development of a unified set of tools used in the company. This makes it possible to reduce the stack by eliminating unnecessary and duplicate solutions (for example, when different departments of the company use different tools with identical functionality). Moving away from technology sprawl simplifies stack support, its administration, and reduces licensing costs. At the same time, the expertise of the IDP support team for this toolkit grows, as there is no need to scatter resources on learning different products and solutions.
Knowledge Sharing: Creating an IDP platform implies developing detailed documentation that guides users through typical cases - from building a CI/CD pipeline to deployment in production. This ensures the continuity of expertise and guarantees that the team will be able to continue working with the tools even if some of the expert employees leave. The bus factor effect is minimized.
Security Enhancement: The IDP platform is essentially a single point of access to tools. This makes it possible to integrate security solutions into the "user-tool" chain - for example, to check access rights and perform approval procedures. IDP users can also use IT resources and services that have already been approved by security personnel.
Standardization and Improved Collaboration: Platform Engineering involves using a specific set of tools and frameworks. This simplifies application development and allows for the development of a clear standard for components, such as monitoring, logging, and tracing. Development teams can use ready-made components and functionalities to quickly create applications and services, which also simplifies the integration of the created solutions with each other. This relieves some of the cognitive load on development teams and increases their efficiency.
Onboarding Acceleration: The implementation of an IDP platform with a single stack and common rules for working with tools reduces the time it takes to connect new users or entire teams to the project. This is achieved through SSO mechanisms and tight integration with development tools, as well as pre-agreed rights and access from the security department.
Fast and Non-bureaucratic Resource Acquisition: Platform Engineering allows easy access to computing resources through a pre-agreed catalog of IT services (from the security and IT departments), which publishes IaaS and PaaS services adapted for the company. In this case, it takes a few minutes to get the necessary resources, not weeks.
All this allows development teams to be relieved from solving typical tasks and helps them focus on delivering value to the business.
Revolutionize your infrastructure – Discover our platform engineering services. Connect with us!
Barriers to Adoption and Development of Internal Development Platform
The adoption of Platform Engineering as a core company concept can be hindered by various factors, both financial and organizational. However, the blockers are usually typical.
Lack of a clear understanding of what IDP is and how the platform should work. There is no strict definition of what an IDP platform is and how it should look like. Therefore, managers are afraid of "creating something wrong." But in reality, there can be no standard: the IDP platform is created taking into account the company's stack and work patterns, so projects of different companies differ. It is impossible to "create something wrong" if you do it according to the needs of your team.
Fear of having to cut staff. Often, the development of the Internal Development Platform is slowed down at the level of employees, including DevOps, who are worried that they will be left without work. But this is a misconception. The Platform Engineering concept does not imply a reduction in staff, but simply a shift in their focus to solving other tasks.
The need to restructure processes. After the implementation of the IDP platform, the teams responsible for IT infrastructure and information security may have to change their usual working procedures, which means that they will have to restructure their processes. This can be a challenge for both the IT team and information security, as well as for the management, which is afraid of potential risks. But in practice, with proper preparation and desire, the transition to a new methodology of work is smooth and seamless.
The need for investment and the length of the journey. Implementing Platform Engineering and developing an Internal Development Platform is not a one-day task. Such innovations require regular investments and allocation of resources from the business. However, the increase in the frequency of releases, the reduction of errors and the increase in development productivity justify any costs.
By outsourcing the development of the IDP platform, the company can mitigate some of the shortcomings and accelerate the adoption of the Platform Engineering concept.
Implementation Timeline and Effectiveness Evaluation
The implementation of an IDP platform is a continuous journey. Even after restructuring internal processes, building a self-service portal, and moving away from a "technology zoo," it is important to continue developing the platform, updating the available stack, improving the user experience, and more. Tools, market needs, and business processes change, so IDP as a product also requires regular changes.
Typically, it takes companies several years to adapt their business processes to use an IDP platform. The timeframe depends largely on the size and expertise of the team involved in building the IDP platform, as well as the chosen implementation approach - building on a ready-made solution or developing from scratch.
It is difficult to directly assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing such projects. Therefore, conceptually, when determining the rationality of investments, several criteria are taken into account.
Ratio of developers to DevOps engineers. For example, if before the implementation of the IDP platform, 10 DevOps specialists were required for 10 development teams, then after the implementation of the solution, with a three-fold increase in development scale, the number of DevOps engineers will grow insignificantly - for example, to 15 people (without the platform, there would be almost a proportional growth).
Release frequency. Due to the reduction of approvals, checks, and secondary tasks, as well as the improvement of interaction between development teams, Time-to-market is also reduced. This allows increasing the number of releases without sacrificing quality and without a significant increase in the workload on developers.
Number of errors allowed. The unification of tools and technologies, as well as the ability to obtain the necessary resources without complex manipulations, allows for a significant reduction in the number of errors made during deployment.
Performance evaluation. The formalization of approaches and tools allows you to set and track metrics (both technical and business), which, in turn, will help you assess the effectiveness of changes or quickly identify bottlenecks.
Here are some additional points to consider:
The maturity of the organization's DevOps practices. Organizations with a more mature DevOps culture will be better equipped to adopt and use an IDP platform effectively.
The level of support from senior management. The success of an IDP initiative depends on the level of support from senior management.
The availability of resources. Implementing and using an IDP platform requires resources such as time, money, and people.
Overall, the implementation of an IDP platform can be a complex and challenging undertaking. However, the potential benefits can be significant, including improved developer productivity, reduced time to market, and increased software quality.
Platform Engineering vs. DevOps and SRE: Differences in Scope, Focus, and Goals
Platform engineering, DevOps, and SRE (Site Reliability Engineering) are three concepts and methodologies used in information technology to optimize software development and support processes. While they share common principles and goals, they differ in scope, scale, and primary tasks. Depending on the work context and their needs, modern companies may rely on platform engineers, DevOps engineers, and SREs to ensure the excellence of their products and services.
Scope of Responsibility:
Platform engineering focuses on developing and building platforms to support applications.
DevOps and SRE focus on the processes and methodologies for software development and operations.
Scale:
Platform engineering is often geared towards creating highly scalable and flexible platforms.
DevOps and SRE work at the level of processes and operations within a specific system scale.
Goals and Objectives:
DevOps aims to reduce the time between software development and deployment, ensuring continuous delivery and automation of processes.
SRE focuses on creating highly reliable systems and supporting them.
Platform engineering aims to provide infrastructure and services as a platform to support various applications and services.
Focus of Work:
Platform engineers concentrate on creating and maintaining an internal platform that facilitates application development and operations. They provide other developers with tools and services to accelerate the development process.
DevOps encompasses a broader range of areas, combining development, operations, and ensuring continuous application development and improvement.
Processes and Methodologies:
Platform engineers typically follow Agile methodologies with an emphasis on delivering results and continuous improvement. They strive to create flexible and efficient infrastructure for developers.
DevOps covers a wider range of methodologies and processes, such as CI/CD (continuous integration and delivery), test automation, and containerization.
Area of Responsibility:
Platform engineering focuses on the architecture and infrastructure of the internal platform.
DevOps is responsible for integrating application development and operations.
Platform Engineering vs. SRE:
Focus of Work:
Platform engineers focus on developing and supporting an internal platform for other developers, providing tools, services, and abstractions that facilitate application development.
SRE is primarily responsible for ensuring the stable and reliable operation of a product or service. Their main task is to maintain high availability and quickly respond to problems in the production environment.
Culture and Methodology:
SRE emphasizes a culture of reliability, where everyone in the team becomes responsible for the reliable operation of the system. They are often guided by the principles of "build, measure, tune" and "serve the customer."
Platform engineers typically follow Agile principles with an emphasis on continuous delivery and iteration.
Area of Responsibility:
Platform engineering focuses on the architecture and infrastructure of the internal platform.
SRE is responsible for the operational side of the product or service.
How Platform Engineering Compares to DevOps and Cloud Engineering
DevOps focuses on unifying development and operations by giving teams ownership of both application and infrastructure. However, as the complexity of applications and infrastructure grew, the cognitive load on DevOps teams became too high. Platform engineering builds on DevOps by creating a shared platform that reduces this cognitive load and standardizes processes across teams.
Cloud engineers specialize in managing cloud infrastructure, such as AWS or Azure, by setting up services and managing costs. Platform engineers, on the other hand, take these cloud services and integrate them into a broader platform that developers can use. Essentially, platform engineering adds a layer on top of cloud services, making them easier to use and more accessible to internal teams.
Key Differences: Platform Engineering vs DevOps vs SRE
AspectPlatform EngineeringDevOpsSREFocusInternal platform developmentDevelopment and operations integrationSystem reliability and operationsScaleLarge-scale platformsSpecific system scaleProduction environmentGoalsPlatform for applications and servicesContinuous delivery and automationHigh availability and reliabilityProcessesAgile methodologiesCI/CD, test automation, containerizationCulture of reliability, "build, measure, tune"ResponsibilityPlatform architecture and infrastructureIntegration of development and operationsOperational side of product or service
Responsibilities of Platform Engineering
Standardization of Tools and Practices
Platform engineers select the tools needed to deploy and run applications and ensure that they are used consistently across all teams. This includes CI/CD pipelines, cloud platforms, Kubernetes clusters, and security protocols.
Creation of an Internal Developer Platform (IDP)
This platform provides developers with a self-service portal where they can access pre-configured infrastructure and services, such as databases, Kubernetes clusters, and CI/CD pipelines. The IDP abstracts away the complexity of managing infrastructure, allowing developers to focus on coding and business logic.
Collaboration with Development Teams
Platform engineers work closely with development teams to ensure the platform meets their needs while maintaining best practices for security, compliance, and efficiency.
Continuous Development and Improvement
Like any product, the internal developer platform needs continuous updates and improvements. Platform engineers are responsible for iterating on the platform, adding new features, and ensuring it meets the evolving needs of the organization.
Key Problems Solved by Platform Engineering
Cognitive Load on DevOps Teams: Traditional DevOps practices require teams to manage both application development and infrastructure. This increases the complexity of tasks for individual engineers, such as maintaining Kubernetes clusters, managing CI/CD pipelines, and ensuring security compliance. Platform engineering centralizes these responsibilities, reducing the mental load on DevOps teams.
Inconsistency and Duplication: When multiple teams use different tools and configurations, it creates inconsistencies across the organization. Platform engineering solves this by standardizing the tools and environments, reducing duplicated efforts across teams.
Scalability and Efficiency: With traditional DevOps, each team might configure and manage its infrastructure separately, leading to inefficient resource use. Platform engineering provides a shared platform that is scalable, consistent, and optimized, allowing for easier management of resources and infrastructure.
Key Takeaways from the Article:
Platform Engineering is a major technological trend that companies worldwide are actively following by creating their own IDP platforms. The methodology has become particularly popular due to the active digital transformation of businesses.
Building IDP platforms gives businesses competitive advantages in the era of digital transformation and helps them overtake competitors on the go by maximizing efficiency.
Today, companies do not need to dive into IDP platform development from scratch: they can choose ready-made solutions and partners with experience and expertise in IDP construction.
